Interesting idea, and better IMO. It would be incompatible with the
recently-defined gerund"n, and it would make noun"_ problematic because
boxed arguments might look like gerunds. Therefore I vote against it.
Henry Rich
On 12/27/2021 10:01 AM, Raul Miller wrote:
Ok, that makes sense.
Also, your statement:
u"n is defined to do two things: partitioning and assigning a rank
for combining purposes.
is key, here, I think.
Would we lose any important identities if the partitioning for cyclic
gerunds were one rank lower than the rank for combining purposes?
Thanks,
--
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
https://www.avg.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
