{{try.{{1 2+3 4 5}}''catch.2 catchd.3 end.}}0
2
Is that what you wanted me to check?
What do you get from that expression?
Thanks,
--
Raul
On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 12:12 PM Henry Rich <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Can you check this again? I was wrong, but I can't get the results you
> report either. It appears to me that
>
> * if there is a catch., the catchd. clause is ignored
> * if there is a catchd., debug is not turned off by the try.
>
> It follows that
>
> * with catch. B1 catchd. B2, the B2 is ignored but debug is not turned off
> * catchd. B1 with no catch. is equivalent to catch. b1 catchd. end.
>
> Henry Rich
>
> On 1/12/2022 7:26 PM, Raul Miller wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 6:07 PM Henry Rich <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> If you have catchd. and catch., the catch. block is ignored.
> > Not necessarily.
> >
> > {{try.{{1 2+3 4 5}}''catch.2 catchd.3 end.}}0
> > 2
> >
> > However, if debug is turned on, then yes -- in that case the catch.
> > block is unreachable.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
>
>
> --
> This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
> https://www.avg.com
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
