Unfortunately this is simply following the rules by which an empty argument is executed on a cell of fills. There's no way to know that the execution is intended only to get the shape and type.

Henry Rich

On 4/27/2022 10:50 AM, Raul Miller wrote:
    1 T.''
6
    T.&''&>i.0

    1 T.''
7

I think what's happening here is that there's an exploratory execution
of T. as a part of getting the type and shape of the empty result.

But that mechanism should not spawn new threads. (Conceptually, I
think T. should generate an error in that context, which would inform
that mechanism to use a fallback to the simplest case result
prototype.)

Thanks,



--
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
https://www.avg.com

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to