On 5/31/06, Roger Hui <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It does not seem onerous that a definition be named for it to be handled by the debugging facilities.
is that why we can't get the values of the arguments? The tacit is named. i had assumed the arguments received the x/y names implicitly...
A rule of thumb: if you can not figure out where in a tacit defn is the error, the defn is probably too long and you should split it.
Heh, there is only so short you can make a non trivial recursive tacit. But yes, divide and conquer is the strategy. ~greg ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
