> 25 b./'' NB. should be _1 > 1 Fixed for the next J6.01 beta.
> 0 (16 16 b.) 0 NB. Non-atoms only seem to work for functions_16..15 > |index error > | 0( 16 16 b.)0 Your observation is correct and is consistent with the description in the dictionary. > 0 b. b. 0 NB. Since this is an atomic verb, shouldn't monadic valence also > be zero? > _ 0 0 This is a minor issue, but a plausible explanation is that the monad m b. is equivalent to 0&(m b.) and m&u has unbounded monadic rank. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mark D. Niemiec" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wednesday, June 14, 2006 2:06 pm Subject: [Jbeta] Several minor issues with b. > I have found a few of unrelated issues with b. > These are not specific to the beta, as they also exist in J 5.04: > > 25 b./'' NB. should be _1 > 1 > 1 (25 b.) 7 NB. not transparent > _7 > _1 (25 b.) 7 NB. correctly transparent > 7 > > 0 (0 b.) 0 > 0 > 0 (0 0 b.) 0 > 0 0 > 0 (16 b.) 0 > 0 > 0 (16 16 b.) 0 NB. Non-atoms only seem to work for functions > _16..15|index error > | 0( 16 16 b.)0 > > 0 b. b. 0 NB. Since this is an atomic verb, shouldn't monadic > valence also be zero? > _ 0 0 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
