Funny how one can not see something like those unmatched tags... My eyes just slid right past them - kind of like parsing words such as "of" in paragraphs. I guess it also means that Safari (and surprisingly Firefox) tolerate the standards violation of </a> being a required tag, often it is the other way around.
Perhaps the offending instances could be fixed as XHTML <a name="ole" /> (a similar offense in wd_commands.htm). But seems I cannot test this hypothesis in my environment... Looking (again and more closely [blush]) at various htm files I see some other violations of HTML standards - namely inclusion of tags, as in script_bigfiles.htm <a name="bappend"><b>bappend</b></a><br><b></b> HTML 4 (and XHTML) requires that you "place the <a> tag inside other markup tags, not the opposite." This means that some browsers may not render the "bappend" above as bold. The extra bit after the <br> may indicate that the line was generated by a program, perhaps making it a little easier to clean up such "offenses". -joey At 01:14 +0800 2006/08/14, bill lam wrote:
Joey K Tuttle wrote: > Looking at the source for the J601 Release > Highlights, the source looks quite clean and correct. > > What browser/OS are you using? > > At 11:32 -0400 2006/08/13, Philip A. Viton wrote: >> In the J601 Release Highlights: >> >> - under 601 Features, the first paragraph shouldn't be a hyperlink. >> >> - under J Engine Incompatibilities: the first 5 paragraphs (ie lines) >> shouldn't be one hyperlink. >> >> (This is a very old problem). Same problem in firefox/win32. In source there are tags like <a name="feats"> and <a name="incompat"> I guess they can be fixed by adding </a> eg. <a name="feats"></a> and <a name="incompat"></a> -- regards, bill
---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
