That is a good suggestion, but won't be done in time for this release.
----- Original Message -----
From: "bill lam" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Beta forum" <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2006 9:56 PM
Subject: Re: [Jbeta] Problem with WD command 'pmove' in beta v
Eric Iverson wrote:
The _1 inheritance for pmove was left over from long ago and is
decomitted in 601. As Oleg points out it is mentioned the Release
Highlights. pmovex didn't support _1 for inherited values and it was
strange that you could pmove the form to _2 _2 but not to _1 _1. You
need to change your code to inquire the current xywh in pixels with
wd'qformx' and then provide your desired arguments to wd'pmovex...'.
workaround by qformx is quite acceptable, but I wonder if w and h can
be elided
to mean _1 in the previous release.
pmove x y [w h] ;
pmovex x y [w h] ;
--
regards,
bill
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
