On 4/14/08, Mark D. Niemiec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > True. However, I think that in this case, _. shouldn't be > produced at all (for much the same reason that J treats 0 = 0*_ > and 0 = 0%0, even though the hardware produces NaN in both cases.)
But 0 and _ are consistent arguments. Mathematically speaking, _. is an inconsistent argument. -- Raul ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
