The proposed alternatives are jgtk and jhs as appropriate to requirements. Note that jwd will continue to work with newer J engines for some time to come. Of course this plan of action depends on real users experiences with the new front ends. Nothing is cast in stone and it all depends on community feedback and contributions. I think users will be pleased with jgtk when first released and as it evolves. The jhs front end is still cride and limited, but I personally believe it is has a bright and long future.
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 10:30 AM, Andrew Nikitin <[email protected]> wrote: > > The page http://www.jsoftware.com/beta.htm says: > > > The j.exe (Windows API) front end has served us well for a long > > time. Perhaps its days are numbered and it is not too early to > > start moving on. > > What is the suggested alternative/replacement for j.exe? > Is it jgtk? Or jhs? Or something else? > > _________________________________________________________________ > Hotmail has tools for the New Busy. Search, chat and e-mail from your > inbox. > > http://www.windowslive.com/campaign/thenewbusy?ocid=PID28326::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WM_HMP:042010_1 > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
