Hi John,
> Though I am happy to see COM's backside it was the most useful and stable > J/Win interprocess protocol on Windows. I gave up using the dll server > years ago as I like my processes separate and protected. This is one of > the > great things about JHS. > > The current JHS setup looks great for passing text data around but what > about large binaries. How do you pass a 10e6 element array from a C# > program to J and get a large array response. The old COM interface > provided > this functionality, > that's exactly the kind of thing I'm doing. The J approach adds so much that it's worth it even with COM. Hopefully there'll still be a tightly integrated way of moving data in future (sockets?). I must look into that when there's more time available. -Steven ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
