Craig Wrote: > I have parallel installations of 6.2 and 6.5 so I can switch between > them whenever I like, > > I've never had success with DISCNUMBER = 1 though, that's why I took > the X of Y approach and it's worked well untill recently. It works as expected for me in 6.5.
Is it only the "X of Y" albums that are being sorted incorrectly, or is it all multi-disc sets? I wouldn't be amazed if the "X of Y" entries broke something. It's going to be very dependant on how SlimServer decides to parse that, and I wouldn't be surprised if the parsing has changed. I've seen other people use "X/Y" and similar style entries. Putting anything other than a number into a tag where a number is expected is a gamble. I use DISC=1 DISCC=2 DISC=2 DISCC=2 I believe it been said that the DISCC (or DISCCOUNT) is ignored by SlimServer. -- JJZolx Jim ------------------------------------------------------------------------ JJZolx's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=10 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=23966 _______________________________________________ beta mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/beta
