mavit;239276 Wrote: > Sorry, yes, http://bugs.slimdevices.com/show_bug.cgi?id=5623 and > http://bugs.slimdevices.com/show_bug.cgi?id=5624.
It definitely fixes 5624 plus a few others I can think of. This is the first time I've noticed 5623 and I'm not sure I understand it. The new RPM doesn't use PREFIX so I guess it's fixed, but I don't understand how the reported issue would cause the service to fail to start. > One more thing, shouldn't the perl code go into vendor_perl rather than > site_perl, as it does with all of the Fedora-provided perl-* rpms? Hmm, maybe. The difference isn't mentioned in the Fedora guidelines. Do you know if this is documented somewhere? -- Fletch ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Fletch's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=529 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=39789 _______________________________________________ beta mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/beta
