andyg;250167 Wrote: > Is it slow at all levels of BMF or just the top level? How many items > are in your music folder? Are they on a local or network drive? How > fast is your machine? Is your items per page pref set higher than the > default of 50? > > The main reason it's slower is because it makes a lot more database > queries (one per folder item). This is done for bug 1360 to ignore > files referenced in cue sheets, as well as to look for artwork. The > player interface does neither of these things. > > However, on my system, it still takes less than half a second to > display a listing of 50 items (when the mtime has not changed and it > doesn't have to read the filesystem). In that case it takes about 1 > second, and I'm using a network drive, too.
Hi. As I've stated earlier: This is a 500mhz disk server with 256MB ram, with my music collection on a local USB2 drive, and 250 items are displayed on each page. The display time seems proportional to the number of displayed items. The last page (with only 40 items) displays considerably faster (1-2 seconds). Since the top level is the only one with loads of items, it is the only one that suffers enough to be annoying. By the way, one query per item seems like a serious waste. Couldn't this have been done with a smarter query? I haven't got any cue sheets, maybe I could disable the extra queries altogether somehow? -- neu242 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ neu242's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=13471 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=40992 _______________________________________________ beta mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/beta
