mherger;399916 Wrote: 
> > Thanks for the link good stuff, however I was more concerned of what
> is
> > normal for SC running on Linux, should it use memory in this way  ?
> 
> On a CentOS based box, SC has been running for a few days (Fr/Sa):
> 
> 5:40  88:32  94:12.51 squeezec squeezec  6540 squeezec  15   0 83208 
> 75m 3800 S 14.6  7.5  94:12 squeezecenter-s
> 
> -- 
> 
> Michael

Ok did i get this ?
8919 squeezec  15   0 84372  77m 2724 S  1.7  8.1   0:45.34
squeezecenter-s

very similar ? it is like this all the time but it seems like the
memory get cached out in some fashion ? there will be less and less
free memory (until it crashed and kernel terminated it ) but the top
command will show similar reading all the time ? Run the free -m cmd
every 10 minutes or so after a fresh start and you will see something
else.

I'm dimly aware of the fact that linux uses ram in some clever
fashion.
"Linux likes to use any spare memory to cache disk blocks" i read in
the link ramage posted, so i've not been looking at the right thing it
is probably normal to use most of your ram if your server is up all the
time.

And yes i did this run the server without sc a while no decrease of
free memory, now sc is on again and I'm slowly loosing free memory but
I'm only playing radio without proxying (direct streaming enabled )
weird ? or not, if I misunderstand linux memory use ? which is very
likely.

I would discard this a random fluke if it was not for the one instance
of my kernel actually terminating SC for lack of memory.

but I'm not able to crash with 25118 I'm now testing 25127
Hmm now i spammed the tread with even more useless stuff :-/ I'll post
back when it actually crashes on me again.


-- 
Mnyb
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mnyb's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=4143
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=60468

_______________________________________________
beta mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/beta

Reply via email to