On Jul 10, 2009, at 2:40 PM, Phil Meyer wrote: >> This is measuring the raw performance of the scanner, without any >> disk >> read overhead, and is pretty encouraging. > > Encouraging, yes. > > How much of that is due to the scanner being an exe, and how much is > due to Sqlite though. I'm thinking that it's mainly the compiled > scanner processing that is the difference, not the DB engine?
Err, it was on my Mac. Also, the term "compiled" on Windows is misleading, it's still Perl. The DB engine is not a factor here, SQLite is plenty fast. The problem is DBIx::Class and the changes I put in work around some of those issues. _______________________________________________ beta mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/beta
