Moonbase;454026 Wrote: > ... I propose using a more general "wildcard" character instead, like > "?" (for one unknown character) and "*" (for multiple unknown > characters) this is what we use with filesystems ever since. ...
I totally agree. Why should 'rückert' be seen as equivalent of 'ruckert'? Only because in English you don't use diacritics (some very rare cases excluded) doesn't mean a character with a diacritic should be treated as the same without diacritic in a search. Characters with diacritic are different characters. An Ø is an Ø, not an O. (And it's just a coincidence that Händel in German sounds the same as Handel in English.) And where would this stop? Should I be able to find Dvořák by typing Dvorak? Teus -- Teus de Jong ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Teus de Jong's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=15415 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=67321
_______________________________________________ beta mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/beta
