mherger;496721 Wrote: > Can tapestry do this? I was refering to tapestry, not MusicIP (which I > use and love a lot, btw). That's exactly what Tapestry is aimed at - > playlisting from your library given a song/ artist, genre and/or descriptor metadata. No doubt for those that want to be Internet connected it can also generate "other artists you might like" type stuff from outside your collection.
MiP's great too - I rely on it at present for playlisting. Given a choice though I'd likely opt for Tapestry because it enables a richer experience. In an ideal world I'd have both means of generating a playlist. mherger;496721 Wrote: > How much would you be willing to pay for some licensed algorithm (eg. > MIP embedded or similar) as a one off fee?For Tapestry, if properly > implemented I'd happily part with $50-$100 as a one-off and I'd be prepared to pay a nominal or volume based annual subscription fee to deal with metadata addition for any new albums I add. For MiP I'd pay a once off fee, say $50 for perpetual analysis and useage. Of course, if their mixing algorithm were improved/ enhanced, new features added, I'd be happy to pay for them also. mherger;496721 Wrote: > We're in a business where one buck additional production cost is a > lot...Only because your product positioning is currently aimed at the commoditised mass market. It shouldn't be -- the quality of your audio offering is superior to everything the else in the mass market, but your presentation is wrong. Fix the presentation - what this thread is about, and you can comfortably reposition at the hi-fi end of the market. -- kakklank ------------------------------------------------------------------------ kakklank's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=33849 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=72512 _______________________________________________ beta mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/beta
