Yeah can you enable artwork debugging and reproduce so you can find out which file it is?
On Sep 16, 2010, at 12:16 PM, JJZolx wrote: > > Is this a bug? > > > Code: > -------------------- > > [10-09-16 10:08:39.9750] Slim::Utils::Scanner::Local::rescan (143) > Discovering files in D:\slim\67\music > [10-09-16 10:08:40.2217] Slim::Utils::Scanner::Local::__ANON__ (215) > Removing deleted files (0) > [10-09-16 10:08:40.2219] Slim::Utils::Scanner::Local::__ANON__ (268) > Scanning new files (0) > [10-09-16 10:08:40.2221] Slim::Utils::Scanner::Local::__ANON__ (321) > Rescanning changed files (0) > [10-09-16 10:08:40.2236] Slim::Utils::Scanner::Local::rescan (143) > Discovering files in E:\Flac > [10-09-16 10:08:55.0626] Slim::Utils::Scanner::Local::__ANON__ (215) > Removing deleted files (0) > [10-09-16 10:08:55.0628] Slim::Utils::Scanner::Local::__ANON__ (268) > Scanning new files (3) > [10-09-16 10:08:55.0796] Slim::Utils::Scanner::Local::__ANON__ (321) > Rescanning changed files (0) > [10-09-16 10:08:55.4398] Slim::Music::Artwork::precacheAllArtwork (430) > Starting precacheArtwork for 4 albums > [10-09-16 10:08:55.4915] Slim::Utils::Misc::msg (1179) Warning: > [10:08:55.4912] buffer_consume_ret: trying to get more bytes 10282 than in > buffer 1010 at C:\Program Files\Squeezebox Server 7.6 > Trunk\server\CPAN/Image/Scale.pm line 44. > [10-09-16 10:08:55.5110] Slim::Music::Artwork::__ANON__ (523) > precacheArtwork finished in 0.0709071159362793 > > -------------------- > > > Also, the three new tracks scanned above were from three different > albums that already existed. It shouldn't have been necessary to > precache any new artwork. _______________________________________________ beta mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/beta
