Philip Meyer;604258 Wrote: > Or any particular reason why a switch is necessary.
thats b/c u either don't listen or reject outright what is said. sqlite will be better for lower powered hardware, according to the devs. it will result in fewer software conflicts, according to the devs. it will be a better exp overall, according to the devs. you don't believe them. fine. i have seen the problems firsthand of mysql, so i have np giving the benefit of the doubt, and if they don't deliver, i will certainly say so. Philip Meyer;604258 Wrote: > There's loads of extra processes that get spawned from SBS. If you look > in server\Bin\MSWin32-x86-multi-thread, you'll see several binary images > for file type support. e.g. lame for transcoding to mp3. Perhaps all > of these should be re-written to be embedded inside SBS to eliminate > extra processes and software conflicts? I think not! Firewall/AV > software can (and does!) cause any of these things from working.> > > > > > > strawman. my point was about a separate mysql process. i have seen > > the problems first hand. going to sqlite should, in theory, help. we > > shall see. also, i didn't like how sbs would leave processes running > > that were no longer needed when SBS was closed. > > > > > > Philip Meyer;604258 Wrote: > > > > > > >and i am saying why do you say that? what exactly do you lose that > > > >outweighs the benefits of sqlite? > > > > > > > And I'm saying what are the clear benefits of SQLite? There's no clear > > > benefits of either;> > > > > > > > so as far as you know, you lose nothing. if you don't believe the > > devs, thats fine, but they obviously disagree with you. > > > > > > Philip Meyer;604258 Wrote: > > > > > > >unlikely. this would only happen if they started selling a server > > > box > > > >to go with the player box, (meaning something better than the touch > > > >server). besides, they have such a large installed userbase, i just > > > >can't see it happening, it would alienate way too many users. > > > > > > > The current userbase can continue with current SBS software. They > > > don't have to continue to support existing users and Full SBS > > > indefinitely. They recently announced less support for SB3 (endeavor > > > to make new SBS work with older products, but not guaranteed).> > > > > > > > what they can do and what they will do are two totally different > > things. it makes sense to truncate older products over time, all > > companies do, but that doesn't mean that the server itself is in > > any danger any time soon of being unsupported, and with the DLNA > > work its clear they aren't currently headed in that direction > > currently. > > > > > > JackOfAll;604279 Wrote: > > > Glad you got to the bottom of exactly what was damaging your hard > > > drives! LOL.> > > > > > > > i'm a comptia A+ certified hardware tech. i know what i'm talking > > about. do you? -- MrSinatra www.lion-radio.org using: sb2 & sbc (my home) / sbrec & ipeng (parents' home) - sbs 7.5.3b - win xp pro sp3 ie8 - p4(ht) 3.2ghz, 2gig ram - 1tb wd usb2 raid1 - d-link dir-655 - 45k+ mp3 ::VOTE FOR 'BUG 15604' (http://bugs.slimdevices.com/show_bug.cgi?id=15604)!!!:: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ MrSinatra's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2336 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=84697 _______________________________________________ beta mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/beta
