frank1969 wrote: > Not quite sure, Michael, I think it happened some weeks ago, might be > 33930 oder 33932 - I'll try to test with an old copy when I do my next > update. > > Description: > Before: MP3 files of one album in one folder - embedded artwork and > folder.jpg in folder => artwork is shown > > Change: > Adding some tracks to the folder (with the same artwork embedded as the > other ones, folder.jpg stays unchanged) - only change made to the > existing tracks, is changing the track-tag from (eg. 01/10, 02/10... to > 01/14, 02/14). > All other tags are the same (album, albumartist ...) > > Result: > The "old" tracks are shown with the default grey "cover art work > symbol", > the "new" tracks are shown as a separate album (with the same name) and > the correct cover art...
Thoughts . You are aware of that embedded art have precedence over cover.jpg so as long as there is an embedded art tag it wins it does not matter if you have a file . I would make a tag change on all album files ( new an old ) so that they get the same time stamp . I would make sure that there is no difference In tagging re new vs old files , using mp3tag or puddle tag . Make sure that I embed the same art in all files ( with the exception of albums with track art, LMS handles track art very buggy , but that is another bug ) Or you sure this a new behaviour , it is very similar to the many other scenarios where you end up with double albums after a tag change and " scan for new and changed " . This usually fixes itself after a " clear and rescan ". I would say that " fixing " existing albums pretty much always gives you weird entries in LMS like double albums . Quite surprised that you have not seen this before ? But it is a good one as you found a bug where new and old file separate in two albums in some sort of predicable and reproducible manner, maybe it helps Michael to analyse this . If they are still giving you separate albums/no artwork after a "clear and rescan" I would suspect the tagging. If this is only a problem after an incremental scan , I would say it is LMS not entirely predictable " new and changed " scan. "New" is mostly ok ,the " changed " part is somewhat random . ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Mnyb's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=4143 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=95104 _______________________________________________ beta mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/beta
