If the rescan also does a vacuum i wonder why there is such a difference in the filesize?
I can't say. I can only guess. Eg. that the scanner (which is running the vacuum) is not the only application accessing the database, thus there might be some data written by the server after the vacuum happened. But then the differences you achieve with your additional vacuum run are neglectable, aren't they? Like in 0.0x%...
-- Michael _______________________________________________ beta mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/beta
