mherger wrote: > > Argh... that's likely due to my attempt at not running a last, > unnecessary request over the tracks table. I've now committed an > alternative approach, which might actually be slightly faster. But I > preferred the first approach for its simplicity. So... more testing to > do. A new build is on its way.
Thanks! Scan ran through r1644672553 Will do some tests later and try r1644678709 so it looks it's about other issues... ------------------------------------------------------------------------ frank1969's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=31156 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=115919 _______________________________________________ beta mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/beta
