Commit: 96da223d0b0082bcbc104c93d7d6ee90cbb7b2ca
Author: Kévin Dietrich
Date:   Fri Jan 29 21:39:19 2016 +0100
Branches: openvdb
https://developer.blender.org/rB96da223d0b0082bcbc104c93d7d6ee90cbb7b2ca

Quiet some warnings.

===================================================================

M       intern/cycles/kernel/kernel_volume.h

===================================================================

diff --git a/intern/cycles/kernel/kernel_volume.h 
b/intern/cycles/kernel/kernel_volume.h
index bf77cc0..43dd1b2 100644
--- a/intern/cycles/kernel/kernel_volume.h
+++ b/intern/cycles/kernel/kernel_volume.h
@@ -497,7 +497,7 @@ ccl_device_inline VolumeIntegrateResult 
kernel_volume_integrate_ray(
        if(volume_shader_sample(kg, sd, state, new_P, &coeff)) {
                int closure_flag = sd->flag;
                float3 new_tp;
-               float3 transmittance;
+               float3 transmittance = make_float3(1.0f, 1.0f, 1.0f);
                bool scatter = false;
 
                /* distance sampling */
@@ -761,7 +761,7 @@ ccl_device void 
kernel_volume_decoupled_record(KernelGlobals *kg, PathState *sta
        float3 accum_emission = make_float3(0.0f, 0.0f, 0.0f);
        float3 accum_transmittance = make_float3(1.0f, 1.0f, 1.0f);
        float3 cdf_distance = make_float3(0.0f, 0.0f, 0.0f);
-       float t = 0.0f, t1 = 0.0f;
+       float t = 0.0f;
 
        segment->numsteps = 0;
        segment->closure_flag = 0;
@@ -771,6 +771,7 @@ ccl_device void 
kernel_volume_decoupled_record(KernelGlobals *kg, PathState *sta
 #ifdef __OPENVDB__
        int vdb_index = kernel_data.tables.density_index;
        bool has_vdb_volume = kernel_data.tables.num_volumes > 0;
+       float t1 = 0.0f;
 
        if(has_vdb_volume && 
kg->float_volumes[vdb_index]->has_uniform_voxels()) {
                /* TODO(kevin): this call should be moved out of here, all it 
does is

_______________________________________________
Bf-blender-cvs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-blender-cvs

Reply via email to