Good to hear, thanks!
On Sun, Apr 4, 2010 at 10:54 PM, Janne Karhu <[email protected]> wrote: > The whole commit is quite self contained and won't break anything. Like I > wrote in the commit message this commit is only the core physics so it > doesn't really touch anything that could cause problems. > > janne > > On Sun, 04 Apr 2010 15:49:08 +0300, Matt Ebb <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Sun, Apr 4, 2010 at 10:29 PM, Janne Karhu <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Log Message: >>> ----------- >>> Fluid physics for particles by Raul Fernandez Hernandez (Farsthary) and >>> Stephen Swhitehorn: >> >> Hi, this is interesting stuff, curious to take a look at it. How much >> likelihood is there of this disturbing things though? I was under the >> impression we were in a semi-freeze now, avoiding committing any large >> changes in order to stabilise what's in SVN now. Anyway, maybe the way >> this fits into the particle system doesn't introduce much potential >> for breakage - if so, that's great. Otherwise I would personally >> really prefer to to see any major developments/changes done in >> branches for the time being. >> >> cheers, >> >> Matt >> _______________________________________________ >> Bf-committers mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers > > _______________________________________________ > Bf-committers mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers > _______________________________________________ Bf-committers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers
