I was trying to get CMake to be less verbose since one of the reasons Ton sticks to nan-makefiles is its less verbose output but can see we want to see whats rebuilding so commented this change. Still cant find a way to disable cmakes progress output.
On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 5:02 AM, Joshua Leung <[email protected]> wrote: > I don't really use makefiles, so I probably shouldn't really comment. > > If this commit only suppresses the long-winded commands used to > actually build the files, then +1. That's great, since I really don't > like to see what commands are being executed in great detail, making > it harder to see the warnings themselves. > > It's not so great however if it suppresses all information about what > file is being compiled apart from when warnings show up. That is, it > should only show > "Compiling 'somefile'" or "Up to date 'somefile'" > > > On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 2:30 PM, Nicholas Bishop > <[email protected]> wrote: >> I'd like to see it come back, for the same reason of it being hard to >> tell if it recompiled what you thought it did. >> >> I guess hiding all the noise is good for a full rebuild, but that's >> not the typical case for me. >> >> -Nicholas >> >> On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 9:57 PM, Matt Ebb <[email protected]> wrote: >>> On 08/06/2010, at 00:28 , Campbell Barton wrote: >>> >>>> Revision: 29306 >>>> >>>> http://projects.blender.org/plugins/scmsvn/viewcvs.php?view=rev&root=bf-blender&revision=29306 >>>> Author: campbellbarton >>>> Date: 2010-06-07 16:28:37 +0200 (Mon, 07 Jun 2010) >>>> >>>> Log Message: >>>> ----------- >>>> minor changes to cmake, main noticable change is to disable RULE_MESSAGES >>>> which gives less output with makefiles (easier to spot warnings). >>> >>> I don't like this very much, it's hard to see what file it's up to, what >>> files have been compiled and what's actually going on during the build. I >>> find it useful to see which files have been built - sometimes it reminds me >>> of things like forgetting to save a file that was edited. >>> >>> I know it's possible to change this in cmakelists, but what are other >>> people's opinions? >>> >>> Matt >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Bf-committers mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> Bf-committers mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers >> > _______________________________________________ > Bf-committers mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers > -- - Campbell _______________________________________________ Bf-committers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers
