Hi Campbell <--snip> > > Another change to help our api be less confusing is to have operator > properties directly accessible. > > class Operator(bpy.types.Operator): > myprop = bpy.props.BoolProperty() > def execute(self, context): > ... this line > print(self.properties.myprop) > ...could be written as > print(self.myprop) > > At the moment print(self.myprop) will print the property definition, > but not the property (which is what you want!) > I'd like to keep self.properties available since its how operators > work internally and can be passed as keyword arguments, so this change > is mostly for convent access. > The question that came to mind here (as I mentioned on irc) is that if you *did* want to print/access the property definition, how would you do so if self.myprop just returns the value? cheers Bassam PS- thanks for the mail, it cleared up some things that had been long confusing me re. the api.
_______________________________________________ Bf-committers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers
