On 16/11/2010 1:29 PM, Dan Eicher wrote: > And it doesn't strike you as strange that there is 'great risk' in keeping > your changes to yourself (while profiting from 'costless' labor of others) > while passing the changes back to the project is pretty much the textbook > definition of a 'mutually beneficial relationship'? > > Not even a little strange? > > Almost like it was intentional even?
This is straying into a discussion on the "merits" and/or lack thereof in commercial software developers using the GPL. Something which has been explicitly avoided in this discussion and has, in my opinion, allowed for technical discussion in regards to the proposal to proceed without getting bogged down in "personal preference" discussions. If possible, I'd like it to continue without straying into the area where flame-wars are prevalent. Please. -- Regards, Benjamin Tolputt Analyst Programmer _______________________________________________ Bf-committers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers
