On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 9:09 AM, David Jeske <[email protected]> wrote:
> ...I'm beginning to feel like a minority in wanting Blender to one day > become a > real disruptive open-source alternative to these commercial tools. > > And why does Blender need to change it's license to do this? You seem to equate 'success' with blender having a secondary 'proprietary plugin' market and a bit of FUD over the GPL thrown in for good measure. Oh, and friend who says 'Blender wouldn't be good enough today even if the license was fixed'. I suppose it would be different if these studios could make and distribute their own changes (to make Blender 'good enough') without having to give these changes back to the community? Dan _______________________________________________ Bf-committers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers
