Hey Thomas, Sorry to bother you with silly questions, but do I add myself to the ModuleOwners list on the wiki page, or does an official from BF do that?
Cheers, Pete On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 12:23 PM, pete larabell <[email protected]>wrote: > Yeah! > > I currently have both i386 and amd64 builds working, so when the word for > 2.56 goes out, so long as I know what rev. to compile, I'd be more than > happy to provide them. > > :) :) :) > > > On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 12:17 PM, Thomas Dinges <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hey Pete, >> sure there is no reason why we should not also have official FreeBSD >> Releases! >> >> Thomas >> >> Am 28.12.2010 19:09, schrieb pete larabell: >> > Hi Thomas, >> > >> > Just curious as to whether there is enough need (want) for FreeBSD >> builds >> > that you'd like someone to do official builds, or shall that just be >> left to >> > graphicall.org uploads? >> > >> > I built the 2.55 for FreeBSD i386 and amd64 architectures but didn't get >> a >> > response yet about 2.56 when I inquired about not seeing FreeBSD on the >> list >> > of platform builders being asked if they were ready/able to do 2.56. >> > >> > I checked the ModulesOwners to see if FreeBSD was listed on Release OSes >> and >> > it wasn't. If there is not enough need for it that's fine, I can just >> post >> > to graphicall, but I'm certainly willing and able to build for official >> > releases too so long as I know in advance that I should be doing it. >> > >> > I know the unofficial title of FreeBSD build maintainer was sorta given >> to >> > Jaevixa McNomera after she started releasing builds in graphicall some >> > months ago, and I offered to pick up the task when she was near fatally >> > injured a couple months ago. I spoke with her about when she'd be back >> and >> > able to resume her role in building these, and her current projected >> time is >> > summer 2011 at the soonest. >> > >> > So basically, if you guys want a FreeBSD guy to do release builds, I'm >> happy >> > to do it. :) >> > >> > Cheers, >> > Pete >> > >> > On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 11:50 AM, Thomas Dinges<[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > >> >> Hey everyone, >> >> for the last few months it was quite unclear, especially for new >> >> developers and patch-submitters who is responsible for a module. That >> is >> >> now finally solved. >> >> >> >> Ton has reviewed and approved a list, I have made about 1 year ago. >> This >> >> list was in the wiki and most of the current developers already took a >> >> look at it, so it should be all fine. >> >> >> >> Mindrones made a template of it, so this list can be put into other >> wiki >> >> pages which is very useful. >> >> http://wiki.blender.org/index.php/Template:ModulesOwners >> >> >> >> It would be cool if everyone could take a look at it again and if there >> >> is something wrong please answer to this mail here on the list. >> >> >> >> You can also checkout the guidelines on how to put this info on wiki >> pages. >> >> http://wiki.blender.org/index.php/Template:ModulesOwners#Guidelines >> >> >> >> Thomas >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> Bf-committers mailing list >> >> [email protected] >> >> http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers >> >> >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Bf-committers mailing list >> > [email protected] >> > http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers >> _______________________________________________ >> Bf-committers mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers >> > > _______________________________________________ Bf-committers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers
