Just read Tom M's posting on LibMV and was wondering where the discussions have taken place for it regarding future directions.
Nuke apparently (according to the User Guide[1]) harnesses VXL for some of its algorithms. OpenCV, for example, has a simple relevant point optical flow tracking example (lkdemo.cpp 151 lines of code[2]) that would seem to at least be worth examining, if it hasn't already been considered.[3] I am wondering the upside benefit of pushing LibMV over existing options. Sincerely, TJS [1] http://thefoundry.s3.amazonaws.com/products/nuke/documentation/NukeUserGuide_6.1v5.pdf [2] https://code.ros.org/trac/opencv/browser/trunk/opencv/samples/cpp/lkdemo.cpp?rev=4240 [3] I am aware of Ton's reluctance to add another dependency, but perhaps the complexity of computing vision here warrants it? _______________________________________________ Bf-committers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers
