They use at least bash, wget and gcc. Lets tell GNU so they can sue them! :)
I've got another idea (then I stop spamming here):
Would it comply to App Store rules if one would write a native OS X application
(conforming to HIG
and BSD licensed) that is a "Blender Downloader" or "Blender Installer" or
"Blender Manager". This
would not include blender, but would download and install blender. It would
also provide a menu with
options like "put blender into dock" and "associate .blend files with blender"
etc. Maybe it could
let you manage multiple blender installation. E.g. blender 2.49, blender 2.5x
and a list of the
latest GraphicAll builds.
If I would use OS X I would write such a software just to see whether Apple
rejects it.
-panzi
On 07/22/2011 03:19 AM, Shaul Kedem wrote:
> So OSX uses no GPL software? none?
>
> On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 8:16 PM, Alex Fraser<[email protected]> wrote:
>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> On 07/22/2011 12:54 AM, J. wrote:
>>>> [...]
>>>> From the Adium Mailing list:
>>>>
>>>> "In the current agreement for the App Store - on all platforms -
>>>> there are several provisions which restrict distribution. These are
>>>> incompatible with the GPL.
>>
>> Right. The problem, as I understand it, is that section 6 of the GPLv2
>> states "You may not impose any further restrictions on the recipients'
>> exercise of the rights granted herein", but the App Store imposes further
>> restrictions. See:
>>
>>
>> http://www.fsf.org/blogs/licensing/more-about-the-app-store-gpl-enforcement
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Alex
_______________________________________________
Bf-committers mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers
