Hi Andrew, Can you provide evidence for who is spreading, supporting or enforcing this "Standard Notation"?
Apart from that - especially when this standard appears disputable - we can much better ensure we are 100% clear about it in docs. Look at this wonderful Panda3d page: http://www.panda3d.org/manual/index.php/Matrix_Representation I rather see this approach for us! -Ton- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Ton Roosendaal Blender Foundation [email protected] www.blender.org Blender Institute Entrepotdok 57A 1018AD Amsterdam The Netherlands On 8 Dec, 2011, at 7:05, Andrew Hale wrote: > Hi All, > > I have written a patch which rectifies a cause of confusion among > Blender > uses when starting out with matrices and vectors. The patch ensures > consistency between the matrix representation and matrix/vector > products so > that they behave in the way that people familiar with math expect. > This is > achieved by adjusting pythons access to the internal storage, while > keeping > the internal data the same. Note that this does not interfere with how > matrices are stored internally or how matrix products, additions etc > are > performed internally. > > The patch can be found here: > http://projects.blender.org/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=29534&group_id=9&atid=127along > with a more in depth explanation. > > Thanks, > Andrew > _______________________________________________ > Bf-committers mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers _______________________________________________ Bf-committers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers
