http://wiki.blender.org/index.php/Dev:Doc/Quick_Hacks
Excuse me adding all own suggestions to the `Approved Section`, will update this page as I come across more. Page could have more friendly introduction - but wanted to get things moving. Feel free to add more items (especially other devs adding tasks to approved section). @Tom, would you be able to go over gsoc wishlist and add small sounding projects to the `User Contributed Tasks` section? On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 4:54 AM, Campbell Barton <ideasma...@gmail.com> wrote: > ack, typo - should be: > * not `janitor` work. > > On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 4:52 AM, Campbell Barton <ideasma...@gmail.com> wrote: >> +1 >> >> Would be great to have though we have bad track record of anything >> that looks like a todo/task list becoming a wish-list. >> >> Our simple todo list is really only simple for existing devs who are >> familier with the code: >> http://wiki.blender.org/index.php/Dev:2.5/Source/Development/Todo/Simple_Todos >> >> Criteria for this could be... >> * existing core devs should be confidant they could do an an afternoon >> without running into big problems. >> * things we are sure can be accepted if written to acceptable quality. >> * not generator work. >> >> Perhaps disclaimer at the top to only add items if you're a developer >> who knows some task is in fact easy (users should check with devs >> first before adding items). >> >> Or have a section with approved items and a second section with tasks >> for review - users can add to - and devs can check if there easy >> enough to qualify or remove. >> >> On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 4:09 AM, Tom M <letter...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> I was reading an article about the growth rate in developer >>> contributions to libreoffice compared to openoffice, and a signficant >>> amount of the growth was attributed to them having an 'easyhacks' list >>> of tasks, bugs, etc. >>> >>> These range from >>> >>> a) provide stack traces for bug reports that don't have stack traces >>> b) confirm whether a 'bug' reported by a static analysis (clang) is valid >>> >>> to tasks that require more in depth knowledge of the source >>> >>> http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Easy_Hacks_by_required_Skill >>> >>> basically it looks like they autogenerate these pages from the >>> bugtracker using a set of tags (easytask, interesting, the skill >>> required) >>> >>> http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Easy_Hacks_Bugzilla_Whiteboard_Status >>> >>> perhaps we could do something similar? >>> >>> There are also a ton of small feature requests that are worth doing >>> (ie see the wishlist for gsoc); but which core devs don't necessarily >>> have time for. >>> >>> LetterRip >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Bf-committers mailing list >>> Bf-committers@blender.org >>> http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers >> >> >> >> -- >> - Campbell > > > > -- > - Campbell -- - Campbell _______________________________________________ Bf-committers mailing list Bf-committers@blender.org http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers
