I searched it in keywords such as "convert", "quad", but enrolled in Bug 
Tracker newly because a similar report was not found in Bug Tracker.


PerfectionCat.

----- Original Message -----

From: PerfectionCat <[email protected]>
>To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
>Date: 2013/1/4, Fri 11:05
>Subject: [Bf-committers] Fae of triangle cannot be converted to quadrangular 
>face
>
>As for everybody, this year thanking you in advance.
>
>
>In addition, I make the following sentences by machine translation.
>There may be the part which does not understand a meaning, but, in that case, 
>please forgive it.
>
>Because Bug Tracker stops, I report it here.
>Because I did not confirm it, to see all source codes, interpretation may be 
>wrong.
>I am glad then when I have you teach right interpretation.
>
>You recognized this problem at point in time of version 2.63, but because the 
>opportunity which is mentioned this problem was lost, you apologize the fact 
>that you can send report.
>In addition, this is not something which shows improvement method.
>Inspecting cause, because it reports that it is ascertained it does not pass.
>
>When by the fact that the function of NGON is taken in, converting the 
>triangular face to the quadrangular face, it has become the cause trouble 
>occurring.
>Quadrangular face with CTL+T is designated simply as face of triangle, next 
>that resetting to quadrangular face with ALT+J works normally.
>But, it converts quadrangular face to face of triangle with CTL+T, next it 
>cuts in the form which cuts off face of two triangles in half alongside the 
>diagonal of the opposite of original quadrangular face.
>It is the expectation which becomes the kind of shape which 4 divides 
>quadrangular face alongside the diagonal.
>Selecting face of the triangle which it adjoins, when it converts to 
>quadrangular face with ALT+J, it is the expectation where problem is found.
>Executing with whichever combination, it does not work normally.
>
>That I think whether it does not mean that the value which is set to the 
>variable limit which is used with the function edbm_tris_convert_to_quads_exec 
>of editmesh_tools.c is inadequate.
>Setting PAI as the value which does not provide restriction in trial, when it 
>executes similar operation, in order past version to work in the same way, it 
>is thought.
>
>+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
>However, the behavior which you can think that it is inadequate with when it 
>is several is shown.
>
>Plane is converted to face of triangle.
>Next, exceeding the base of face of other triangle one vertex alongside the 
>diagonal, it arranges.
>Finally, it converts to quadrangular face.
>
>Actually when it executes, it is clear, but the side on the diagonal going 
>out, new quadrangular face is formed with four vertex.
>The air like the result of being reconstructed when normal information has 
>missed does this.
>
>+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
>I have observed to only the value which variable limit can take, but I do not 
>inspect whether that value how is handled in inside to.
>This report of investigation being vague, serves honest purpose, whether or 
>not is, you do not understand in me.
>But, if this becomes the opportunity of addressing the issue, it is fortunate.
>
>The description regarding the inadequate behavior of the part where it put 
>with above-mentioned “+” is visible when you verify including subdivision 
>surface modifier, in order to be processed appropriately.
>Therefore, you think that description should be deleted, but that it is the 
>funny case because you think boldly without deleting described, it leaves.
>
>I put the image of the sample to the following URL.
>
>
>http://www.4shared.com/archive/T8f1xcH1/fig.html
>
>The environment that I confirmed:
>
>Blender version 2.65.5 Rev 53539
>Windows XP/32bit
>msvc9+SCONS
>
>PerfectionCat
>_______________________________________________
>Bf-committers mailing list
>[email protected]
>http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Bf-committers mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers

Reply via email to