On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 9:27 AM, Alex Fraser <[email protected]> wrote: > On 16 October 2013 06:26, Campbell Barton <[email protected]> wrote: >> At the moment we're looking to only convert branches that have been >> merged into trunk (so trunk has valid history). >> >> Other branches wont be lost and the subversion repository wont be >> deleted, but there are so many branches which were never merged it >> adds a lot of overhead to making a full checkout - (a git clone would >> download every GSOC branch that was ever made for example). > > That might not be an issue - git is pretty efficient. It would be > interesting to know how big that overhead would be. > > Alex
IIRC it cut down the final repo size ~200mb (after aggressive GC on both tests), some branches contain full checkouts of other projects too - eg, assimp, swig are in branches + docs & example files in some cases too. We can cleanup this in some cases (like removing html docs+images from history) but it gives us more work to do too. -- - Campbell _______________________________________________ Bf-committers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers
