We've got an annotated tag which isn't really different from the branch you're suggesting to have.
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 10:59 PM, Martijn Berger <[email protected]>wrote: > Hi everyone, > > About the back-porting of patches. Is there a good reason we do not have a > '2.70-stable' branch on which we can back-port all these. > Now that we have git i think that is would not cost us much and that we > stand much to gain from implementing this. > > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 4:53 PM, Sergey Sharybin <[email protected] > >wrote: > > > Hey, > > > > Still don't really think doing 2.71 a correction release is a good idea, > > too much quite WIP things in the code atm anyway. So thinking of rather > > doing 'a' release. > > > > Here's the page with the revisions which i consider to be back ported to > > the 'a' release: > > > > > http://wiki.blender.org/index.php/Dev:Ref/Release_Notes/2.70/Bug_Fixes#Fixes_since_2.70_release > > > > Please don't modify it directly, rather poke me to add/remove stuff in > > there. > > > > -- > > With best regards, Sergey Sharybin > > _______________________________________________ > > Bf-committers mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers > > > _______________________________________________ > Bf-committers mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers > -- With best regards, Sergey Sharybin _______________________________________________ Bf-committers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers
