I was first thinking of a section on the page for the historical data but certainly moving it to separate pages like that is better - old/inactive projects or so.
The information seemed useful to understand the situation, for example the previous efforts on more integrated exports / use of external engines etc (was just thinking of that this morning for other reasons). So is good to not delete it entirely but best also to not have it clutter the page with up-to-date info, hence subpages seem perfect indeed. ~Toni On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 11:48 AM, Brecht Van Lommel <[email protected]> wrote: > There's no standard procedure. Perhaps make two subpages where you can > moves finished and inactive project links similar to what was done > here: > http://wiki.blender.org/index.php/Dev:Doc/Projects > > Archiving the main page is not needed I think, that's supposed to be > something that stays up to date. Just make sure that old projects have > links somewhere still without going through history. > > On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 2:24 AM, Mitchell Stokes <[email protected]> wrote: >> The current dev page for the game engine on the wiki[0] is rather old and >> outdated. I would like to start the page over from scratch (bringing >> anything still useful over from the old page). What is our procedure for >> doing so? Should the page be archived somewhere, or do we just rely on the >> page history? >> >> Thanks, >> Mitchell Stokes >> >> [0] http://wiki.blender.org/index.php/Dev:Source/GameEngine >> _______________________________________________ >> Bf-committers mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers > _______________________________________________ > Bf-committers mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers _______________________________________________ Bf-committers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers
