On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 7:48 PM, Bastien Montagne <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > I’m not fan at all of a 'global staging' branch idea, afaik gooseberry > was supposed to be that… What I mean is, I think it will always diverge > one way or the other. We could make per-patch staging branches, but > would add some noise in our git repo… > > I really prefer storing such things locally. That way, each dev can > handle things under his responsibility the way he prefers (local > branches of course, but maybe also mere list of patches to apply, or > whatever). "Public" branches should be kept for reasonably big projects, > or sensitive things that need early testing/team work/whatever, imho.
The problem with storing things locally is... - Its not clear to the patch submitter what happened. - We rely on each devs hard-disk/backups... or knowing the URL of their github repo. - Another dev can't easily apply the patch (or wont have access to any improvements made after applying). _______________________________________________ Bf-committers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers
