Does the sequence editor in it's current state do any caching during playback? If you're editing exr sequences it might really make sense to work with jpg proxies.
On Mon, 2015-03-23 at 12:05 +0100, Antony Riakiotakis wrote: > Hmmm...it sounds like it's just way more expensive to process the > files in this case since they are floats. Generally there are some > non-obvious tricks to make the sequencer play back better such as > disabling anti aliasing and making sure the target resolution is close > to the footage resolution. > > > On 23 March 2015 at 11:13, Thomas Volkmann <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I just wanted to ask if something is wrong with the way the seqence-editor > > uses > > its cache. > > Basically I have a 1920*1080 exr seqence that I can't get to playback at > > 25fps > > although I have more than sufficient memory and I have set it in the prefs. > > Playing back the same sequence as jpg is no problem at all. > > Does Blenders VSE have a problem with caching exr files? > > > > Here is the thread on StackExchange: > > http://blender.stackexchange.com/questions/27402/vse-not-playing-in-realtime-not-caching > > > > thx! > > _______________________________________________ > > Bf-committers mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers > _______________________________________________ > Bf-committers mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers _______________________________________________ Bf-committers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers
