Anything new on this? I glimpsed at the commits a while ago but haven't found anything related. But it is easily missed with so many commits ...
Am Mon, 23 Feb 2015 00:08:39 +0600 schrieb Sergey Sharybin <[email protected]>: > Hi, > > The patch suggested in the gentoo tracker is not totally perfect to be > applied as-is since it'll likely break Cycles on platform which > doesn't have intrinsics which the builder machine had. But it for > sure gives clues what's going on. > > I'll look into the issue and do a proper solution from our side in > the next couple of days, so stay tuned :) > > On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 2:26 PM, Marco Ziebell > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Could someone please have a look at this report [1], it was > > abandoned in favour of an mail to this list. > > > > There also exists a report in gentoo-bugzilla with further comments > > an a patch?!? > > > > Compiling with "-march=" set properly ("native") is not that > > mysterious. The only problematic thing about "march=native" in this > > case is it enables some instruction sets supported by the processor, > > which causes the build system to fail! > > > > > > Thanks in advanced and best regards > > > > > > Marco > > > > [1] https://developer.blender.org/T42279 > > [2] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=523928 > > _______________________________________________ > > Bf-committers mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers > > > > > _______________________________________________ Bf-committers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers
