Hi,
developers docs are not clearly divided in releases, so I’m not sure what 
you’re asking is possible.

Francesco

On 5 Jun 2015 at 03:00:28, PerfectionCat ([email protected]) wrote:

Hi.
Thanks for your reply.

It is the contents that Blender for Developers in online manual of the official 
site provides that I want you to examine it.

I think that the data used in online manual almost misappropriated conventional 
data now.
You should understand it enough it becomes 2.7, and how a part of the 
conventional function is changed.
Python API is changed, too.
I think that they are renewed sometime soon by contents based on 2.7 
specifications.

I want you to provide it in a conventional form about 2.6 like 2.4/2.5 in 
Blender for Developers.

Best regards.
PerfectionCat

----- Original Message -----
From: Francesco Siddi <[email protected]>
To: PerfectionCat <[email protected]>
Date: 2015/6/5, Fri 06:47
Subject: Re: [Bf-committers] About official 2.6x online manual

Thanks for the clarification!
Is there a specific part of the manual that is unhelpful when looking at it 
from the point of view of Blender 2.6?

Francesco

On 18 May 2015 at 01:12:45, PerfectionCat ([email protected]) wrote:
Hello.
Thanks for your reply.

@Francesco:
Unfortunately it is not it to have wanted to know.
A method to obtain the past version of blender from the official site is 
offered.
That means that it is admitted that a user uses the past version.
However, I was not able to watch a manual of 2.6 that I got used to.
Latest blender is different from 2.6 in specifications.
I think that there is the significance leaving the link to an existing manual 
of 2.6.

I want you to consider whether you leave the link to a manual of 2.6.

Best regards.
PerfectionCat

----- Original Message -----
From: Francesco Siddi <[email protected]>
To: PerfectionCat <[email protected]>
Date: 2015/5/17, Sun 08:28
Subject: Re: [Bf-committers] About official 2.6x online manual

Hello,
I’m not sure I understand what you mean, but the content of both manuals is the 
same, with the difference that the new version is more up to date and uses a 
new system, based on Sphinx and SVN.

Let me know if this answers your question.


Regards,
Francesco

On 8 May 2015 at 04:05:44, PerfectionCat ([email protected]) wrote:
Hello.

@Francesco:

Thanks for your reply.

Because a link of 2.6x became the new manual, I asked you a question.
Why is the link of a new manual linked to the manual that a link of 2.6x is new 
to be different?

Best regards.
PerfectionCat



----- Original Message -----
>From: Francesco Siddi <[email protected]>
>To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
>Date: 2015/5/7, Thu 22:57
>Subject: Re: [Bf-committers] About official 2.6x online manual
>
>Hello,
>what you see is the new Blender Manual. We are working on integrating 
>translations (for example the Japanese translation 
>https://github.com/lab1092/blender-manual_i18n).
>
>If you need more information feel free to check out 
>http://blender.org/manual/about/introduction.html.
>
>Best regards,
>Francesco
>
>On 7 May 2015 at 01:18:05, PerfectionCat ([email protected]) wrote:
>
>Hi, Devs. 
>
>A manual of 2.7x is displayed by contents menu of blender wiki when I jump to 
>the manual of 2.6x. 
>Can the manual of 2.6x translated for plural languages not look anymore? 
>I jump from contents menu on the left side of the page of this URL. 
>
>Blender wiki: 
>http://wiki.blender.org/index.php/Dev:Contents 
>
>Image: 
>http://www.pasteall.org/pic/87806 
>
>
>Best Regards. 
>PerfectionCat 
>_______________________________________________ 
>Bf-committers mailing list 
>[email protected] 
>http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers 
>_______________________________________________
>Bf-committers mailing list
>[email protected]
>http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Bf-committers mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers




_______________________________________________
Bf-committers mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers

Reply via email to