Hi, Look at this beautiful WYSIWYG demo page on mediawiki: https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/VisualEditor/Design/User_testing
Just click edit and it's available right away. It even supports D&D image upload (only with account). -Ton- -------------------------------------------------------- Ton Roosendaal - [email protected] - www.blender.org Chairman Blender Foundation - Producer Blender Institute Entrepotdok 57A - 1018AD Amsterdam - The Netherlands > On 28 Feb, 2016, at 2:33, Campbell Barton <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 28, 2016 at 11:48 AM, Sergey Sharybin <[email protected]> > wrote: >> Dan, i'm not talking about compilation on server, talking about compilation >> on my laptop and desktop. >> >> Campbell, I don't follow IRC that much, but happened few times there. >> >> As for timing, while it's not exact 30min (at least not with latest sources >> etc), it's an order of magnitude more on my core i7 desktop, took almost >> 10min to do a rebuilt. After doing simple modifications it's in average >> 5sec. >> >> While content was based on existing wiki, remember how much effort was put >> to fix missing pages and broken libraries. >> >> In any case, we can compare who's machine is faster, it's all not gonna to >> make things faster here and it's not what's the thread originally was about. >> >> Let me summarize and stop wasting time and energy in this discussion. >> >> - I am an opponent of increasing offline-factor of documentation, it just >> adds extra complexity without solving any real issues, or will have the >> same technical aspect issues if they're becoming any more popular for >> editors. >> - I am also an opponent of using dev.b.o's wiki: it is a limited wiki >> engine, it would have more issues as any stand-alone wiki, it wouldn't >> really be any more sustainable to abuse that the current wiki.b.o and i do >> not want dev.b.o being abused in any way. >> - I do agree with the fact that we should fresh install wiki and not have >> any piss-poor hacks in it, and keep it maintainable, accessible by the >> community. >> - I do believe with freshly installed and properly configured wiki we can >> avoid splitting of any documentation further, and to keep documentation in >> an actual non-broken state we'll need a strong editor team (we'll need it >> with any underlying tool for docs/manual, it's not something new, it is >> just something current wiki is lacking completely). > > +1 this has been the plane for some time anyway, closed T47563. > > In the future it would be good if we could discuss topics without knee > jerk reactions and mixing up multiple topics. > _______________________________________________ > Bf-committers mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers _______________________________________________ Bf-committers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers
