I updated that particular index and hopefully it is less confusing. If people still do not like the change we can do a one column layout which will be more similar to how the current indices look.
On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 12:18 PM, Harley Acheson <[email protected]> wrote: > Aaron, > > A couple of suggestions off the top of my head about the index, which > apply to both your changes and the current version > > > - Clicking on an index section header opens up that section. But clicking > again on the same spot does not close it again. You must click on the > little "minus" to close even though you allow clicking anywhere to open. > Actions like this are assumed to be reversible so clicking anywhere on the > section header should close it if open. > > - Related to the first issue, but separate in case you choose to make one > change and not another: You can click on a closed section title to open it > and then close it with the "+" (as mentioned above). But at this point, > with > all sections closed you must click on the last section's "+" to open it > again > even though you can click anywhere on the titles of all its siblings. These > items are in identical states so should behave the same. > > - When all index sections are closed you show a "+" on hover only for > the current section and that doesn't make sense because all sections will > expand the same way when clicked - the currently viewed one is no > different. If the intention is to show which item is "active" then that > should > be done is a different way. If the intent is really to show the user what > would > happen when the item is clicked then the "+" should be shown on hover for > all items. > > - Clicking on a section to open it will bring us to that section's "index" > page. > the links inside that section take us to places within that area. A problem > (and an objection to my suggestions above) is that the section links do > not include one to the index file. So I've decided to examine the contents > of an area but that examination contains everything but the starting point. > The contents should include everything, including a link to the index. It > is > okay that the header to the section also contains a shortcut to the same > place as a convenience. > > > Regards, Harley > _______________________________________________ > Bf-committers mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers > _______________________________________________ Bf-committers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers
