On Sat, Jul 16, 2016 at 11:06 PM, Ton Roosendaal <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > I heard something about this. I assumed it was just a place for people with > similar production background to share info or feedback about Blender. > Blenderartists.org is far too noisy, I fully understand the need. > > But I didn't get the impression anyone who is serious about contributing to > Blender would participate in non-public work groups. That's not very > productive. > > Our own lists and communications channels are usually on topic, low traffic, > these places should be welcome for professionals (and anyone with little > time) to contribute to Blender. If our channels fail, then I'd be pleased to > hear what to do to improve it. > > Laters, > > -Ton-
While the existence of private group prompted me to raise the topic, I think this is a more general issue. It's also not great if decisions are getting made over lunch at the Blender institute for eg. While I was at the institute this didn't happen often (we were aware that its problematic and tried to avoid), Nevertheless sometimes when you're in the same room its quicker to come to some agreement. For larger topics, it's not great that anyone working remotely can't see whats going on. _______________________________________________ Bf-committers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers
