Can tell you from experience: in some cases vs. boost-usage it can even be a speed regression ;)
Should be really done carefully. Jens Am 20.11.2016 um 20:01 schrieb Sergey Sharybin: > Hi, > > The original discussion came to conclusion that we'll switch to C++11 in > the 2.8 branch and keep master as is. > > What are the user-measurable improvements from such a bump in master? > > On Sun, Nov 20, 2016 at 2:45 PM, Martijn Berger<[email protected]> > wrote: > >> >Hi everyone, >> > >> >We have had a discussion about c++11 for at least 2 years. We have decided >> >to allow c++11 features in 2.8, and this implies compiling in c++11 mode >> >with a supporting compiler. This email is not about that. -- Jens Verwiebe Allerskehre 44 - 22309 Hamburg Tel.: +49 40 68 78 50 mobile: +49 172 400 49 07 mailto: [email protected] web: http://www.jensverwiebe.de _______________________________________________ Bf-committers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers
