Hi, I'm fine with updating to 1.0.28. Just gave it a test and backported libsndfile as a package to release environment. Now it's as difficult as dpkg -i now.
Perhaps we should just call it a request to bump version of the lib, and maybe list version on wiki. I don't see big reason why it's dynamic library. Maybe was precompiled or so. If you compile it yourself, feel free to make it static, On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 6:33 PM, Ray Molenkamp <[email protected]> wrote: > While tracking down T52756, I stumbled on some version mismatches in our > versions of libsndfile. > > Windows vc12 x86/x64 1.0.25 > Windows vc14 x86/x64 1.0.26 (which has a seeking bug) > Linux x64/x86 1.0.25 > Mac OS x64 1.0.24 > > https://wiki.blender.org/index.php/Dev:Doc/Building_Blender isn't listing > any specific version for libsndfile, given there's a bunch of CVE's fixed > since 1.0.24, should we just straighten out all platforms on the latest > version (1.0.28)? > > Second,libsndfile is one of the few libs we link dynamically on windows > (and > nobody seems to remember why), if we're gonna straighten out the lib > versions > on this, anyone mind if I switch this to static libs like most of our other > externals? > > --Ray > > > > _______________________________________________ > Bf-committers mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers > -- With best regards, Sergey Sharybin _______________________________________________ Bf-committers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers
