That render time increase at the end is odd. The fact that it happens with Embree but not BVH4 should give a clue, but I'm not familiar with the implementation. It's also odd that Embree MB is faster.
Maybe all the particles are separate objects? In the native Cycles BVH without motion blur, those would have their transform applied. On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 12:22 PM, Jaros Milan <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > I tried to make some comparison of w/o Motion Blur (BVH4 vs EMBREE-BVH8): > > http://blender.it4i.cz/rendering/the-daily-dweebs/ > > Do you know why the rendering time increases from 907/908 frame? > (particles, ....) > > Thanks. > > Milan Jaroš > > _______________________________________________ > Bf-committers mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers > _______________________________________________ Bf-committers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers
