if you bunch up all releases since 2014, yes that does seems to imply 36% are still on 32 bit.
however if you split it out per version it paints a 'slightly' different picture https://imgur.com/a/ZG0Gb with only 13.2% of 32 bit users for 2.79 and in a rather steep decline from previous versions. --Ray using this data looking at just the latest blender (2.79) limiting it to On 1/27/2018 9:39 AM, Dan McGrath wrote: > Hi, > >> 6) 32 bit support >> >> I spend a fair amount of time building the blender deps in various > formats, x86 >> it starting to cost more and more time since a few of the projects just > seem >> to test on linux, sometimes on windows/x64 but rarely on x86 leading to > all kinds >> of obscure (usually sse) related build errors. This is starting to take > up a >> significant amount of my time for only a small percentage of end users > (last >> time I asked ~15% of the blender downloads were for 32 bit users) and by > the >> time we release 2.8 this number will probably have dropped even further. > Out of curiosity, I parsed all of our download.blender.org logs since near > the end of 2014, right up until today and stored them in an sqlite3 > database for people to check. You can download the file at: > > https://download.blender.org/ftp/dan/admin/blender_logs.sqlite.bz2 > > I specifically limited the list to 200 status files and only valid > filenames. The schema is: > > sqlite> .schema > CREATE TABLE logs (log_date date NOT NULL, url text NOT NULL, filename text > NOT NULL, blender_version varchar(10) NULL, bits integer); > CREATE INDEX idx_bits on logs(bits); > CREATE INDEX idx_filename on logs(filename); > CREATE INDEX idx_url on logs(url); > sqlite> select * from logs limit 3; > 26/Mar/2014|/release/Blender2.49b/blender-2.49b-windows.exe|blender-2.49b-windows.exe|2.49b|0 > 26/Mar/2014|/release/Blender2.70/blender-2.70-OSX_10.6-x86_64.zip|blender-2.70-OSX_10.6-x86_64.zip|2.70|64 > 26/Mar/2014|/release/Blender2.69/blender-2.69-windows32.exe|blender-2.69-windows32.exe|2.69|32 > sqlite> select count(*) from logs; > 304113 > sqlite> select count(*) from logs where bits = 32; > 101756 > sqlite> select count(*) from logs where bits = 64; > 175647 > > (bits = 0 is for unknown bit size) > > Anyway, for those who were maybe interested, have fun! > > > Cheers, > > Dan McGrath > _______________________________________________ > Bf-committers mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers _______________________________________________ Bf-committers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers
