Aw come on, Morgan. The game is fine with four. Sure it's harder to stay perfectly diversified than it is with three, but that's just part of the challenge. I have played it about equally now with three and four, and like it fine in either configuration. This applies only to Wabash, I have not yet bothered with Chicago Express. I have also never yet broken out my expansion for Wabash, although I realize I'm way behind the curve there.
Anye, you're entitled to your grievances, and of course it's always fun to know what other people's grievances are with each other, but for your own peace of mind and eventual well-being, you should find a way to let go. Otherwise the gefilte fish will make like the grunion and storm out of the Gulf toward your place! On Feb 2, 7:09 pm, sisteray <[email protected]> wrote: > BTW, I think it is also very easy to make a decision about this game > on first play. The more you play it the more you see different ways > to manipulate the system, but there are no big surprises, nothing new > is revealed. If you don't like it the first time, chances are you > won't like it the second or third. > > I knew that I liked the game, but didn't how overburdened the gameplay > was with four (stocks spread too thin), so I figured three worked for > my tastes and I was right. No surprises. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BGG Down" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/BGG_down?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
