On Jun 13, 12:32 pm, Scott Alden <[email protected]> wrote: > One of our mission critical servers is failing - we're working on > getting the failover up and running - no idea how long it will take. > I apologize for the inconvenience.
This isn't an attempt to pile on, but I'm genuinely curious. Isn't the point of a failover server to be already up and running, so that the traffic "fails over" to that system automatically? Is this more of a back-up piece of hardware kept in reserve that you can configure to take the place of whatever piece just blew up, without having to wait for delivery? -- JDL -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BGG Down" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bgg_down?hl=en.
